2011年06月25日
【作者】阿諾德.T
預(yù)覽：
【作者】阿諾德.T
【內(nèi)容提要】
Professor Henry M. Hart, Jr. criticized the current performance of the Supreme Court, suggesting that the quality of the Court's opinions would be improved were the Justices to spend more time in collective deliberation. This article disputes Professor Hart's thesis, and, pointing to recent civil-liberties cases, concludes that the incumbent members of the Court have been successful in fulfilling the Court's function and maintaining its stature as an institution.